analmermaidprincess:

analmermaidprincess:

What a beautiful afternoon to sit in my yard and drink a milkshake

The boys…

image

They have arrived….

123,615 notes   -  8 May 2013

364 plays

adayfornightbird:

Fineshrine - Purity Ring

Love purity ring. Have you heard lofticries captainkubrick?

115 notes   -  8 May 2013

Here’s the thing. Men in our culture have been socialized to believe that their opinions on women’s appearance matter a lot. Not all men buy into this, of course, but many do. Some seem incapable of entertaining the notion that not everything women do with their appearance is for men to look at. This is why men’s response to women discussing stifling beauty norms is so often something like “But I actually like small boobs!” and “But I actually like my women on the heavier side, if you know what I mean!” They don’t realize that their individual opinion on women’s appearance doesn’t matter in this context, and that while it might be reassuring for some women to know that there are indeed men who find them fuckable, that’s not the point of the discussion.

Women, too, have been socialized to believe that the ultimate arbiters of their appearance are men, that anything they do with their appearance is or should be “for men.” That’s why women’s magazines trip over themselves to offer up advice on “what he wants to see you wearing” and “what men think of these current fashion trends” and “wow him with these new hairstyles.” While women can and do judge each other’s appearance harshly, many of us grew up being told by mothers, sisters, and female strangers that we’ll never “get a man” or “keep a man” unless we do X or lose some fat from Y, unless we moisturize/ trim/ shave/ push up/ hide/ show/ ”flatter”/ paint/ dye/ exfoliate/ pierce/ surgically alter this or that.

That’s also why when a woman wears revealing clothes, it’s okay, in our society, to assume that she’s “looking for attention” or that she’s a slut and wants to sleep with a bunch of guys. Because why else would a woman wear revealing clothes if not for the benefit of men and to communicate her sexual availability to them, right? It can’t possibly have anything to do with the fact that it’s hot out or it’s more comfortable or she likes how she looks in it or everything else is in the laundry or she wants to get a tan or maybe she likes women and wants attention from them, not from men?

The result of all this is that many men, even kind and well-meaning men, believe, however subconsciously, that women’s bodies are for them. They are for them to look at, for them to pass judgment on, for them to bless with a compliment if they deign to do so. They are not for women to enjoy, take pride in, love, accept, explore, show off, or hide as they please. They are for men and their pleasure.

Why You Shouldn’t Tell That Random Girl On The Street That She’s Hot » Brute Reason  (via ignify)

Damn, some of the comments on this article by guys like “But I’d like if that happened to me!!1”. Jesus. Before anyone goes “ah those feminists can’t even accept a compliment now without blaming the patriarchy” or something like that, please read the article. it’s not that long and explains clearly how this can be a bad thing.

42,090 notes   -  8 May 2013

becausechocolatethatswhy:

this was shared by a friend on facebook in reference to the heroic acts of Charles Ramsey and the way he quickly became a meme

Charles Ramsey and the troubling viral trend of the ‘hilarious’ black neighbor

Charles Ramsey, the man who helped rescue three Cleveland women presumed dead after going missing a decade ago, has become an instant Internet meme. It’s hardly surprising—the interviews he gave yesterday provide plenty of fodder for a viral video, including memorable soundbites (“I was eatin’ my McDonald’s”) and lots of enthusiastic gestures. But as Miles Klee and Connor Simpson have noted, Ramsey’s heroism is quickly being overshadowed by the public’s desire to laugh at and autotune his story, and that’s a shame.Ramsey has become the latest in a fairly recent trend of “hilarious” black neighbors, unwitting Internet celebrities whose appeal seems rooted in a “colorful” style that is always immediately recognizable as poor or working-class.



“I must not tell lies.”

YEAH BITCH

3,028 notes   -  8 May 2013

lolminoot:

Sleep too little you’re tired, sleep too much you’re tired what kind of fucked up shit is that

58,259 notes   -  8 May 2013

cultszs:

teenagedirtbagb4by:

reverzed:

0yster:

So why is one considered ‘inappropriate’ and the other accepted? Stop sexualising my body. 

I wonder this too. Why is it a man’s breast and nipple are okay to show but a woman’s breast and nipple isn’t.

fave wow

best thing to reblog yet

x



“I’m Elle Woods. I have a bachelor’s degree in fashion merchandising from CULA. And I was a Zeta Lambda Nu Sweetheart, president of my sorority, Delta Nu, and last year, I was Homecoming Queen.”

5,083 notes   -  8 May 2013

thefrogman:

I believe that there are a small group of women who hate men just for being men. I believe that the textbook definition of the word misandry fits that description. I believe there are bad things that happen to men. I believe those issues should be addressed. I do not believe that a fringe group of women who hate men can be blamed for those issues. 

Misandry was a dead word until recently. A group of men who feared the progress of feminism revived the word and used it to undercut the movement. They like having the power being a man provides and they don’t want to lose that. So they created a movement, found a bunch of legitimate issues that affect men, and tried to blame women for those issues. They called this misandry. It’s like conservatives using buzzwords like “death panels” to make people fear health care. They let people assume it meant Obama wanted to kill your grandma. They let there cute little phrase infect the minds of good people and convince them of falsehoods. 

People are telling me that men cannot report rape without getting laughed at. They say this is misandry. It is the fault of women who hate men. But that just doesn’t make any sense to me. When I seek a logical explanation, it seems more likely that this is because men are supposed to be strong and women are supposed to be weak. And rape has been viewed as something that happens mostly to women. So if it does happen to a man, they must be weak. How did this idea of men=strong and women=weak start? I’m pretty sure it wasn’t because of misandry. It is an ancient patriarchy collapsing in on itself. 

True feminism is about fighting inequality. It’s about erasing that strong/weak perception ingrained into our society. Misandry, as the term is often used today, is about trying to blame women for anything bad that happens to men.

If you want to fight to fix issues that affect men, go for it. But I would really consider distancing yourself from this term. It is used to evangelize folks into a movement that is very problematic. A group that can’t handle scrutiny of their comic books and video games, so they send death and rape threats. A group that calls women sluts and think they ask for rape if they show too much cleavage. Those are the people who coined this term, and you should want nothing to do with them or their language.


Public Shaming: Delaware Now the 11th State with Same-Sex Marriage. That's Right, Homophobes...DELAWARE.

rabbleprochoice:

goodreasonnews:

publicshaming:

image

OH, NO. What horrible, tragic event happened in Delaware today?!

A school shooting?!
A bombing?!
…two consenting adults being able to fall in love and get married?

image

Judging by the haters, looks like Delaware has become the 11th state to approve same-sex marriage! WOOO!

image

image

I can’t help but notice none of these tweets say anything like “there’s no reason to believe in the existence of any gods and I hate homos”

“Not many states left upholding God’s Biblical Definition of marriage.”

Oh?

I wasn’t aware that ELEVEN was considered a gaping majority out of FIFTY.

Keep pretending to be oppressed, Christians.

Love,

Rabble

(Cue “not all Christians are like that” messages in 3…2…)

700 notes   -  8 May 2013